The female singer in Sohni Dharti and Jeevay Jeevay
represented the nation’s own appropriation of the concept of a motherland, in
the same way as the subcontinent would see a “Mother India”. To have these very
nationalistic songs sung by women is to appeal to the idea of the nation as
first and foremost a “mother”land, not just your place of birth but the home
that gives you your identity. It is meant to evoke a certain kind of sentiment
for one’s homeland, that of the bond between a mother and her offspring-
unconditional and everlasting. However, though both songs appeal to national
solidarity, Jeevay Jeevay and Sohni Dharti were released at different times in
very different contexts. Jeevay Jeevay makes direct appeals to the preservation
of a unified nationhood whereas Soni Dharti focuses more on the land and its
endless bounty. Both however, reiterate the point that we must view our
homeland as God’s gift for which we must always be thankful; in the same way
that the child is eternally grateful to the mother for gifting him with life.
Jeevay Jeevay was released for the specific purpose of calling for the integration
of east and west Pakistan. Its lyrics appeal for a unity and solidarity among
all Pakistanis: “Bikhray Howoon Ko Bichray Howoon Ko, Ik Markaz Pay Laya.”
Soni Dharti, on the other hand never mentions the name of Pakistan which is why
it is different from other nationalist songs such as Dil Dil Pakistan. Soni
Dharti is written almost as a prayer or a song of praise, which sung by a female singer, renders it with hymn-like qualities.
Sunday, 24 November 2013
'Laga Reh' and 'Allergic to Bullshit'
Ironically, the dialogues included in Shehzad Roy's song 'Laga Reh' like "In ko mat jagaao yeh kisi zaruri kaam se so rahe hain" or "Mujhe fikar yeh nahi hai ke mulk kaise chalega, mujhe fikar yeh hai ke kahin aise hi na chalta rahe' were first used in his song 'Bullshit' for the bollywood movie 'Katta meetha'. The movie highlights the same problems faced by Pakistan today such as corruption. The song went quite viral it was released. The main reason were these lines which highlight the common problems of the people of Pakistan and India
From the idea of Perfect Nation to the need for Reforms
After watching the patriotic songs from the 60's it is pretty clear that the states wants to insert an idea of blind faith in the nation which clearly overlooks many problems which the country faced at the time. These patriotic songs from the only television in the country on-aired songs which gave people a false sense of unity. The people of West Pakistan enjoyed prosperity where as the the East Pakistanis suffered. This hid the ultimate result of the prevailing situation.
In contrast, the songs from the post twentieth century stress on the need for reforms and highlight the loopholes in the system. This is mainly due to the freedom of media in the Musharraf regime. The state no longer controls what the people see.
In contrast, the songs from the post twentieth century stress on the need for reforms and highlight the loopholes in the system. This is mainly due to the freedom of media in the Musharraf regime. The state no longer controls what the people see.
Hum Zinda Qaum Hain (1973)
Some observations regarding the song:
There is the mention
of a singular “Kalma” that everyone believes in.
“hai kalma bhi wahid”
This is problematic
for any faction or individual who has, had, a dissenting view. Also, there isn't much emphasis on anyone out of the periphery of the kalma.
Then there is also the reference to the controversial personality
of Muhammad Bin Qasim:
“Islam ke lashkar mein hain Qasim se farzand “
Just like ‘caravan’ in Dil Dil Pakistan, this song uses the
word ‘lashkar’. The Muslim affiliation to this word is more explicitly
mentioned in Hum Zinda Qaum Hain and also in a more exclusionary sense. Hence,
here the nation is equated with Muslim.Atleast, Dil Dil Pakistan does not use the
word caravan with the idea of an Islamic one.
A lot of the content in this song is similar to the one we saw in Pakistan’s national anthem. The song paints a rosy future for the people belonging to the industrial and the agricultural base.
The video features all youngsters; two men and four women.
It is interesting to note the difference in movement in the two genders. All
women have their arms straight down, with one hand gripping the other in the
front. On the other hand, the men are moving their bodies and arms to the tune
instead of fixing them like the women.
Saturday, 23 November 2013
National narrative today
We've discussed in class how Dil Dil Pakistan was instrumental in helping form a Pakistani national narrative. 'Aesi zameen aur asmaan, in kay siwa jana kahan' - such lyrics point towards something greater than ourselves, an identity, a story that all of us can relate to. Songs that are so stirring to convince the listener to leave everything and pick up arms at the Wagha border. Such songs are important because they are relevant even today. They define the dominant cultural narrative against which future aesthetic forms will be judged.
[Siyaasi Kaarkun / Ali Azmat: Tou kia karun? Himmat haar doon?
SR: Nahi. Laga reh.]
Shehzad Roy's 'Laga Re' points to something extremely problematic for the contemporary Pakistani state. Our national narrative has become inconsistent, dormant, stationary. The lyrics of the song are
'Aas baandh kar tu khaRa hai, tas say mas nahi hota
Tu hai aik aam aadmi, aray bus, ab nahi hota[Siyaasi Kaarkun / Ali Azmat: Tou kia karun? Himmat haar doon?
SR: Nahi. Laga reh.]
And then the song goes of into a chorus of 'Laga re, khara re and para re'. I think that for every line of this chorus his intended audience is different. The stubborn politician should keep on preaching, the poor should continue lying helplessly on the streets and the literate should keep on cheering the status quo mindlessly. Shehzad Roy's criticism, I believe rests solely on a very important point that the status quo will endure no matter what with the consequence of a decaying national narrative.
Bum Phatta and the Post 9/11 Discourse
The musical video of Ali Azmat’s Bum Phatta represents a
popular discourse which attracted the attention of masses in Pakistan after
9/11. The proponents of this discourse treat the West as “nucleus of all evils”
and national governments as corrupt troupes of politicians. The eventual remedy,
for this discourse, is a revolution.
The ingredients of this thought appear at different
intervals in the music video of “Bum Phatta”. Bum, or bomb, symbolizes the miseries and problems faced by the
Pakistani people. The person at the center stage (Ali Azmat) is dressed as
Uncle Sam and he holds an American missile throughout the video. The post 9/11
period and Pakistan’s alliance with the U.S. for the war on terror changed the
dynamics of the region and thus this portrayal of United States in the video is
essentially a reaction. The music video also shows military helicopters in the
background at two intervals [Image-1], pointing towards the military operations
against the Taliban. Therefore, I see this video endorsing the same mainstream
thinking which blames the US and its war on terror for all the issues in
Pakistan.
Criticizing establishment and politicians, Ali Azmat has
used the typical approach of blaming them for each and every problem, primarily
their incapacity to provide the public with basic necessities like food, water
and electricity. However, the music video uses an interesting style of
capturing this issue. It shows these public provisions hanging through a wire
which is controlled by a controller in a closed room. People try to catch them
but fail in despair when the controller draws them back as soon as people try
to catch them. The transition has been shown through kids and young people,
struggling to get a doll and electricity/food, respectively. The whole process
is similar to a game played at festivals where kids get sweets and toys, placed
inside a closed jar, through a hanger whose control is in their hands.
Ironically, the controller has been snatched from their hands by the
politicians [Image-3].
Lastly, the video indicates the march towards bloody
revolution where people first fight among themselves for food and then a revolutionary
agent like Che Guevara appears who kills the guy controlling all the public
provisions which symbolized the overthrow of the establishment. The video
presents the similar situation through which Che brought the revolution in
Cuba, overthrowing US-backed Cuban dictator Fulgencio Batista [Image-2]
For those curious about the blondie in "Laga Reh"
One of the questions raised in
class was the purpose of the ‘blondie’ in the song “Laga Reh” and on looking
closely at the video, one realizes that her presence in some of the scenes
convey a greater meaning. The first scene where we see her is on stage in a
large public space and the group is singing in front of a massive crowd. The
singers are then forced to leave the stage as the politician has to come and
address the masses. The second time we see her is in the bus during the lyrics
“Buzurgon ney mujh sey poocha, “Mulk kaisey yeh chaley ga? She is furiously
playing her drums in a much smaller space with a much smaller and less
enthusiastic audience. The last time we see her is on an empty road that held
demonstrations and riots of the masses. The place is in tatters and there is
debris on the road with absolutely no audience.
The point of charting her
progression in the story is to show the restriction on the creative expression
created by the situations in the country. Initially, the politician drives the
singers away from stage to use it for his own purpose; this leads to a movement
from the stage to the bus. Later, due to unfavourable law and order situations
in the country, these artists are confined to a single empty road. We see the
lead singer running away from the scene as soon as he sees the suited foreigner
showing again that the threat of the foreigner and his power put a complete
stop to the creative expression of the artists. These are all external agents
that affect the singer, his band members and the space allowed to them to
express themselves. Curtailing their freedom is evident not only through the
dwindling space allowed to them but also through the reduction in the audience
they have. Thus, the while the song critiques some pressing issues of society,
it visually points out the limitations faced by singers or creative artists in
pursuing their expression.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

