What’s
in it for Muslims living in India, to move to Pakistan, from the Indian Muslim
perspective? The movie depicts Hindus’ growing
dissent towards Muslims moving to Pakistan and a greater disregard for the
Muslim minority that stayed behind. This anti-Muslim sentiment is quite
justified because the religious ideology of the Muslims failed their community
in India. Notice that the refusal of loans to Salim Mirza is primarily because
the Muslims, who fled to Pakistan, in hope of better living conditions, left him
with a forbidden reputation.
When
we deconstruct the movie –Haleem Mirza’s emigration, Amina’s acceptance of
Shamshad’s proposal, Ajmani Sahab’s takeover of the Haveli, Kazim’s scholarhip
offer and marriage with the minister’s daughter are all matters of timely
opportunity. This not only complies with the maintenance of the socio-economic status
in society but also shows Muslims in a negative light. Is it wrong to adopt
change and opportunity for better living conditions? Aren’t then Salim Mirza’s deteriorating
conditions his own fault to a great extent? In its show of the differences and segregation
that partition started, the movie also describes partition as a convenient process and
mighty hopeful on the other side of the border. This reconciles the ideas of
change with social displacement of some sort. Where part of the Mirza family
sees economic elevation, the other half moves out of the big haveli to a small
house, almost loses business and settles for Shamshad, whom we as viewers too,
find an unworthy choice for Amina. One must consider that Amina’s acceptance of Shamshad’s
proposal is the first time a woman depicts some sort of agency in the movie after
Dada’s failed attempt to stay behind in the Haveli. This also shows that the
youth is more flexible and opportunistic in this new India.
No comments:
Post a Comment