“Phatan khamosh rhi”.
The ending line of ‘Sahib-e-Karamat’ has a profound effect on the reader
because of the apathy from the narrators voice. In both ‘Hatak’ and
‘Sahib-e-karamat’ Manto highlights the silence of the women. In ‘Sahib-e-karamat’
the women don’t speak. We see Gina struggling to break free from the maulvi’s
grasp repeatedly without uttering a word. Moreover, the absence of Phatan’s say
in her own divorce, nikkah and reconciliation catches the reader’s attention.
In this story the silence is like a language of the women, it is a reaction in
itself. Compared to this subdued silent existence of women, Saughandi in Hatak
reacts to her lie of a life in a completely different manner. She takes a
stand, makes a decision and even though she comes alive through the ultimate
insult, in the end even she is left with silence - the “haulnaak sanata”. Nothing
changes; their lives go on in the same way. It is as if both a women’s action
and passivity is equivalent. The end is
the same- the hollow empty silence that is their existence. As a reader the
silence is very important, it tells you the story and highlights the social
difference through which it makes them the central figures of the story. Both
the stories show women as existing in the underground world - without which the
world doesn’t work, but they aren’t given a say. In the end the silence is
overwhelming.
No comments:
Post a Comment